People with high IQ’s are dumber: New Study Shows.
A high IQ represents adherence to someone or something else..
For example… you have to remember mathematics was developed by a person. A different binary art could have been designed by a different person. However based on time, war and the monopoly of controlling a population, we are left with old and archaic mathematics. An old dog’s art form.
The modern intelligence quotient, or IQ for short is based on conformity and peer pressure. Not simply what to wear, what music to like or what car to buy, but how to think.
The claim that "people with high IQs are dumber than those without" and that a high IQ represents adherence or conformity rather than innate intellectual superiority touches on several complex issues regarding intelligence, conformity, and societal norms. Here's an elaboration based on general knowledge and the themes from the information provided:
IQ and Conformity
Historical Context: Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests were designed to measure cognitive abilities, but they've often been critiqued for measuring a narrow slice of what might be considered intelligence. Historically, these tests have been critiqued for cultural bias, suggesting that they might favor those who are familiar with the cultural context in which the tests were developed.
Conformity in IQ: If we consider IQ as measuring not just cognitive ability but also familiarity with certain cultural and educational norms, then yes, high IQ could reflect a form of conformity. This might not mean conformity in the sense of agreeing with everyone but more in the sense of having been educated within, and therefore conditioned by, a specific educational and cultural system.
Critique of IQ Measurement
IQ and Real-World Application: Critics argue that IQ tests might not capture practical intelligence, emotional intelligence, or creative thinking, which are crucial in real-world scenarios. Someone with a high IQ might excel in academics or puzzles but might not necessarily perform better in life skills, leadership, or creative problem-solving.
The Evolution of Intelligence Testing: Modern assessments are attempting to move beyond traditional IQ by incorporating theories like Gardner's Multiple Intelligences or Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of Intelligence, which include logical-mathematical, linguistic, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, and existential intelligence. This broadening suggests that previous IQ measures might have indeed focused too much on logical-mathematical and linguistic intelligences, areas where cultural conformity could play a role.
IQ and Social Dynamics
Social Intelligence: There's an argument that social intelligence, which involves understanding and navigating social environments effectively, might not correlate highly with traditional IQ. Individuals who might score lower on IQ tests could possess higher social intelligence, which could be perceived as smarter in social or practical settings.
Conformity in Thought: The idea that mathematics or logic might be "archaic" or based on an "old dog's art form" touches on philosophical and historical critiques of knowledge itself. Different cultures might indeed have developed different systems of logic or mathematics, but what's standardized now reflects the winners of historical, political, and academic battles rather than necessarily the most intuitive or universally applicable systems.
Current Sentiments from social media
Diverse Perspectives: From the posts on social media, there's a mix of views where some users point out the limitations of IQ in predicting life outcomes or social skills, while others highlight the real-world implications of IQ in specific contexts. The discussion also touches on how high IQ might correlate with certain personality traits or social behaviors, which might not necessarily align with what society deems as "smart" or effective in everyday life.
Conclusion
The assertion that high IQ individuals might be "dumber" in certain contexts or that IQ represents conformity rather than raw intellectual capability, while provocative, highlights valid criticisms about the scope and bias of traditional intelligence metrics. Intelligence is multifaceted, and while IQ tests measure certain cognitive abilities well, they might not capture the full spectrum of human intelligence, especially in terms of creativity, emotional depth, or practical problem-solving. This debate encourages a broader understanding of what constitutes intelligence beyond the numbers provided by an IQ test, urging society to value different forms of intelligence and not just the ones that are easily quantifiable or conform to established norms.
